An investigation discovered proof Ms Godfrey had taken objects together with two laptops from the Queensland Police Service Academy at Oxley, the place she had labored for 18 months throughout 2014 and 2015 earlier than being moved to an IT help place primarily based in Kedron.
An iPad was additionally discovered however returned at a suspension assembly in October 2017. The PSBA had contacted police who started a legal investigation into the theft allegations, which noticed one fraud cost laid towards her a month later.
Over the course of 2017, numerous conduct points had been additionally raised, together with “an inappropriate and expletive-laden exchange in an elevator while a uniformed police officer was present”.
On two events she was additionally discovered to have straight contacted colleagues, together with the PSBA’s chief working officer, asking for them to create an IT place for her on the Oxley academy after feeling she had been “dumped” into the function in Kedron.
As a part of the attraction, Ms Godfrey had sought reinstatement to an AO3 place throughout the QPS, for the disciplinary findings to be wiped from her file and compensation of no less than $25,000 for misplaced revenue, “stress and anxiety”.
Her former employer argued that given her mixed 18 years with the PSBA and QPS it was “inconceivable” she didn’t know the code of conduct necessities across the private use of public sources and their elimination from the office.
Commissioner Knight additionally discovered this to be the case in relation to the accessing and sharing of confidential info.
“The dissemination of confidential performance improvement materials about a co-worker was particularly unkind and concerning, as was the distribution of another colleagues’ IT access details to a co-worker,” she wrote.
Commissioner Knight accepted Ms Godfrey may need had a professional grievance about her function at Kedron and ongoing job satisfaction, although appeared to have “little regard” for the suitable processes.
Whereas the “crux” of Ms Godfrey’s clarification for taking the laptops house was that she claimed she had been granted permission as a result of they had been going to be “written off”, she later confirmed she was not conscious of any coverage that may have allowed this.